BrokerTH
Thai gold ticked back to ฿72,685 on May 25, up ~1% on the day after the recent pullback. Silver, the perennial second pick when investors think about precious metals, has had a quieter year — but the gold/silver ratio is at multi-year extremes and that’s the kind of setup that historically resolves with silver outperforming. For Thai investors thinking about Q3 inflation hedging, the gold-vs-silver question deserves more than a reflexive “gold wins.”
Where each metal sits
Gold in Thailand: ฿72,685 per baht-weight on May 25, down marginally from the ~฿73,000 area of early May. Globally trading around USD 3,100-3,200 per troy ounce.
Silver globally: trading USD 32-34 per ounce range. Gold/silver ratio: roughly 95:1 — historically high (long-run average closer to 60:1). The ratio means one ounce of gold buys 95 ounces of silver, an extreme that’s only happened a handful of times in the last 30 years.
Why the ratio matters
When gold/silver gets stretched, the historical pattern is silver catches up faster than gold gives up ground. From 2020’s COVID extreme (130:1), the ratio compressed to 65 over 18 months — silver rallied roughly 75% while gold rallied 30%. The same dynamic at 95:1 today implies silver could meaningfully outperform if the ratio normalizes toward 60-70.
The caveat: the ratio can stay stretched for a long time. There’s no calendar mean reversion. The setup is favorable, not deterministic.
The Thai retail context
Thai households are deeply familiar with gold — physical purchase, jewelry, gold-shop trading. Silver is much less culturally embedded. There’s a small but growing market for physical silver bars in Bangkok, but the bid-ask spread is wider than gold (5-8% vs 2-4%), and shops carrying silver are fewer.
The cleanest Thai exposure to silver is via global silver ETFs accessed through SET-listed funds (or directly through offshore brokerage), not through physical purchase.
What an inflation-hedge allocation actually looks like
For a Thai investor with THB 1-3M building Q3 inflation protection:
- 3-5% physical gold (existing position acceptable; cap incremental adds)
- 2-3% silver exposure via global ETF or fund — gives the ratio-normalization optionality
- 2-3% gold mining mutual fund (Krungsri, SCBAM offer global gold mining funds) — gives leverage to underlying gold price
Total metals exposure 7-11% of investable assets. Above 15% is overweight for most retail and starts to behave more like a directional bet than a hedge.
Tax treatment in Thailand
Physical gold: 7% VAT applies only to the artisan-craft portion (jewelry-making fee), not the bullion content. Pure investment bars are functionally VAT-free on the gold value.
Silver physical: same VAT treatment in principle, but harder to find pure investment-grade bars without jewelry premium.
Gold/silver ETFs on SET: capital gains are tax-exempt for individual investors holding directly — one of the cleanest tax-advantaged trades in Thailand.
What to actually do now
If you have no metals exposure, start with gold at 3-5% — it remains the default, most liquid, most culturally embedded option. Add a smaller silver position (1-3%) for the ratio trade, accessed via ETF for simplicity.
If you’re already at target gold weight, the marginal money over the next 3 months arguably goes to silver, not more gold. Stretched ratios don’t always resolve, but when they do, they reward the second-position metal more than the first.
Risk in plain terms
Silver is more volatile than gold — 25-30% annualized vs gold’s 18-22%. If you’re using silver for inflation hedging, expect the equity-like volatility. Position size accordingly. The ratio trade is a multi-year setup, not a quarterly one.
